India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi is on a mission to rally international support for potential military action against Pakistan, following a tragic attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) that left 26 civilians dead, as reported by the New York Times.
Modi faces growing concern over a possible escalation between nuclear-armed neighbors, even though there’s no solid evidence directly tying Pakistan to the April 22 attack.
Modi, who is part of the right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has reached out to over a dozen world leaders and called in envoys from more than 100 foreign missions for urgent briefings at the Ministry of External Affairs, according to the report.
Diplomatic sources mentioned by the New York Times suggest that India’s focus seems less about calming tensions and more about securing international support for possible military action.
While not explicitly naming Pakistan, Modi has promised severe consequences in a recent speech, vowing to dismantle “terror safe havens.”
In IIOJK, Indian security forces have launched a broad crackdown, detaining hundreds as they hunt for those responsible.
India has also taken steps to disrupt water flow to Pakistan, suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, expelled Pakistani diplomats, and ordered the immediate departure of Pakistani citizens visiting India.
In response, Islamabad has halted its participation in bilateral agreements, including those related to the Line of Control, which serves as the de facto border between the two nations.
Reports indicate that anti-Muslim sentiment is rising across India, with Kashmiri students facing harassment in various Indian cities, prompting many to return home.
Five days after the attack, India has yet to officially identify any group as responsible, and there’s been little concrete evidence made public to back claims of Pakistan’s involvement.
Briefings given to diplomats included mentions of “technical intelligence,” such as facial recognition data, which linked the attackers to Pakistan, according to officials.
Analysts referenced in the report cautioned that India might take action without feeling the need to present detailed evidence, especially with the world’s attention diverted by the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza.
Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UN have all called for restraint, while both the United Nations and the European Union have pushed for dialogue. However, major powers like the United States seem to be focused on other issues.
The Trump administration has expressed strong support for India’s counter-terrorism initiatives. President Donald Trump has characterized himself as friendly toward both India and Pakistan, but he hasn’t suggested any immediate plans for mediation.
“They will figure it out,” the US president told reporters while aboard Air Force One last week.
Experts pointed out that the United States has yet to appoint an ambassador to India, indicating that South Asia may not be a top priority for Washington.
Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at Johns Hopkins University, mentioned that India seems set on delivering a “spectacular” response, especially when compared to the limited effect of its 2019 airstrike against Pakistan following the Pulwama attack.
Markey cautioned that both India and Pakistan might overestimate their ability to manage escalation, which could lead to a rapid spiral into conflict.
On Tuesday, April 22, a tragic incident unfolded in the Pahalgam area of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), where 26 men lost their lives at a tourist site. India quickly claimed, without providing any evidence, that Pakistani elements were involved in the attack—a claim that Islamabad firmly denies.
The following day, April 23, the Indian Cabinet Committee on Security took decisive steps, including the closure of the Wagah-Attari land transit point, advising Indian citizens against traveling to Pakistan, and officially notifying Islamabad about the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty.
In a strong response, Pakistan’s National Security Committee (NSC) met on Thursday, April 24, and issued a warning that any attempt by India to obstruct water flow into Pakistan would be seen as an act of war. This statement came after a high-level NSC meeting, which also decided to close the Wagah border crossing.
On Friday, April 25, the Senate of Pakistan unanimously passed a resolution dismissing India’s allegations linking Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack, labeling them as unfounded and politically motivated.
The situation escalated further on Saturday, April 26, when the Pakistani High Commission in London was vandalized. This occurred after hundreds of Indian protesters gathered outside the building, resulting in property damage, including broken windows and the application of saffron paint.
On Sunday, Pakistan accused India of inciting the vandalism at its High Commission in London, as tensions between the two nations continue to rise on various fronts. In the aftermath of the attacks, British police arrested two individuals believed to be involved in the vandalism.
Federal Minister for Information Attaullah Tarar condemned these attacks, characterizing them as actions supported by “Indian state and agencies.”
For the latest updates and insights on new developments, visit the NEWSON
Q1. What triggered the recent escalation between India and Pakistan?
The escalation began after a tragic attack in Pahalgam, Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), on April 22, where 26 civilians were killed. India quickly accused Pakistan without presenting concrete evidence.
Q2. How is Prime Minister Narendra Modi responding to the Pahalgam attack?
Prime Minister Modi is rallying international support for potential military action against Pakistan. He has contacted world leaders and briefed over 100 foreign missions about the situation.
Q3. Is there any solid evidence linking Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack?
As of now, India has not publicly presented solid evidence tying Pakistan to the attack. Briefings mentioned “technical intelligence,” but no specific proof has been released.
Q4. What diplomatic steps has India taken against Pakistan after the attack?
India has suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, expelled Pakistani diplomats, closed the Wagah-Attari transit point, and advised Indian citizens against traveling to Pakistan.
Q5. How has Pakistan responded to India’s actions?
Pakistan’s National Security Committee (NSC) warned that any attempt to block water flow would be considered an act of war. Pakistan also halted participation in bilateral agreements and condemned the vandalism of its High Commission in London.
Q6. What role are international powers playing in the India-Pakistan tension?
Countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and organizations like the United Nations and the European Union have urged restraint. However, major powers like the U.S. appear to be focused on other global crises.
